Roll No:- 03.
Email Id:- hitaxidave81@gmail.com
Paper No:- 06 ( The Victorian Age).
Topic:- Three classes by Arnold .
Submitted to:- Maharaja
Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University .
Matthew Arnold (1822-1888)
Matthew Arnold, a literary figure of the Victorian Age, comes next to Browning and Tennyson. He is a poet, critic, religious thinker and educationist. He has the experience of twenty- four years as the inspector of schools. It provided him so much time to meet the different classes and examine their behaviour and habits. This experience pursued him to write ‘Culture & Anarchy’. He has also discussed various topics about true culture.
First let’s see what is culture?
A culture is a way
of life of a group of people. The term ‘Culture’ which originally meant the
Cultivation of human mind and soul. Culture is a collective programming of the
mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from another.
Culture is the process, means it is always going on. And
also it is not static but it is changeable. It is study of social and moral
perfection. And Arnold
says that culture is internal thing. As power of God remains within, similarly
culture also remains within.culture began its complicate modern history etc. Culture was
a new social and intellectual movement.
cultivation -cultivated-civilization.
According to him
culture is a way of life of a group of people. Culture is a collective
programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one group or category
of people from another. Matthew Arnold is really a great fighter for
prevailing real culture in the society of London .
He finds the kingdom of materialism that trying to strangle real culture. So,in
this chapter, Arnold divides the society of England
into three classes- The Aristoctratic Class, The Philistines, The Populace. He
finds Anarchy very common in these class
of his time as The Barbarians, The Philistines as The Middle class and
The Populace as The Working class. His scrutiny of three classes of his time
proves him a good experienced critic.
Let’s discuss one by one..
Image of three class
1) The
Aristocratics:-
For Aristocratic class he views
that this class lacks adequate courage for resistance. He cthe class The
Barbarians. Because they believe in their personal individualism, liberty and
doing as one likes. But sometimes it may happens that ‘Doing as one likes may
bring chaos and anarchy in society’. They are champions of liberty and often
anarchical in their tendencies yet they have their own individualism, field,
sports, and manly exercises are a fashion with them. Their manly exercise their
strength and their good looks are definitely found in the Aristocratic Class of
his time. Their Politeness resembles the chivalry Barbarians, and their
external styles in manners, accomplishments and powers are inherited from the
Barbarians. Even the culture of the aristocrats is skin-deep, external, lacking
in inward virtues.
2) The Philistines:-
The Philistines are the middle
class, according to Arnold .
By Philistine, in its original German sense is meant the uncultured people like
most of the shopkeepers. The Philistines are worldly-wise men, captains of
industry busy in trade and commerce. As a nation of shopkeepers, Philistines
are worldly-wise men, captains of industry busy in trade and commerce. As a
nation of shopkeepers, Philistines have brought all economic prosperity and
progress in the country. They have built cities, they have made railroads, and
lastly they have produced the greatest mercantile navy the world has ever seen.
Thus, they are the empire builders in long as the working class would join
forces with them, they would bring to the land all material prosperity.
3) The Populace:-
The Populace are The Working class
who help the empire builders in Arnold ’s
parlance. Poverty have dogged the footsteps of the Populace whenever they are
engaged in running the wheels of industry. They are raw and half-developed.
They are being exploited by the Philistines and the Barbarians so long. Now
there is a stir and an awakening among the Populace. Democratic awakening has
dawned upon their poverty. The people of this class are becoming politically
conscious and are coming out from the obscurities to assert
“An Englishman’s heaven-born Privilege of
doing as he likes, meeting where he likes, bawling what he likes, braking what
he likes.”
The idea of personal freedom is brought up by Englishman.
And with it they have the concept of anarchy inherently. “Everyman for himself in business and everyman
for himself in religion.”
From that above
the basis of human culture must be
founded – a sweetness and a light. Arnold
considers that, Culture is also connected with the idea of Sweetness and Light
The Greek word ‘aphuia’ means well grown or graceful. He connects the idea of
culture with sweetness and light. He explains the idea with the help of Greek
words ‘aphuia’ and ‘euphuia’. Here the man ‘euphyes’ is going towards
‘sweetness and light.’ Arnold also says that all these three classes are
honest, they have got the ‘sweetness’ essential for ‘culture’ but what they
lack in different proportions is ‘ light’. Despite of such class system, Arnold finds a common
basis of nature in all. So, the spirit of sweetness and light can be founded.
Arnold himself belongs to the Philistines, He is rising above his own
surroundings of birth and social status in his pursuit of perfection, of
sweetness and of light and culture.
He further says that all three classes find happiness in
what they like. They all keep different activities by their social status. However, there are a few souls in these
classes who hope for culture with a desire to know about their best or to see
things as they are. They have desire to pursue reason and to make the will of
god to prevail. For the pursuit of perfection, it does not lie only on the
genius or the talented persons, but also on all classes. Actually, the love or
the pursuit of perfection is within the approach of the common people. He calls
the man of culture as the true nurse of pursuing love and sweetness and light.
He finds such persons in all three classes who have a general human spirit for
the pursuit of perfection. He says that
the right source of authority is best self or the right reason to be achieved
culture.
He further says that the idea of high best self is very hard for the pursuit of perfection in literature, religion and even in politics. The political system prevalent in his time was the Barbarians. The politicians sing the praise of the Populace for carrying their favours. Indeed, they play with their feelings. All these praises are mere clap- trap and trick to gain applause. The ordinary self enforces the readers to misguide the nation. It is more admirable, but its benefits are entertained by the representatives and the ruling men.
" Never go agianst the best light you have,
Take care your light not darkness"
The mission of |
At last we find that we have got three
distinct terms, Barbarians, Philistines, Populace, to denote roughly the three
great classes into which our society is divided ( The Aristocrats, The middle
class, and The working class,
respectively….) All of us, so far as we are Barbarians, Philistines or
Populace. What one’s ordinary self likes differs according to the class to
which one belongs, and has its severer and its lighter side. Now Barbarian likes honours and consideration;
his more relaxed self, field-sports and pleasure. Philistines like money-making
and comforts and tea-meetings. The Populace like bombing, hustling and smashing
and beer. But in each class there are born certain number natures with
curiosity about their best self.
Click here to evaluate my assignment
Click here to evaluate my assignment
Very well explained thanx Hitaxi it will be very useful to me in exam.
ReplyDeleteThanks a bunch for such a perfectly explained summary
ReplyDeleteInteresting blog, it reminds me of Albert Camus, quote:" I am a Mediterranean man, with a healthy body worshipping beauty and the body like the ancient Greeks. I was placed midway between misery and the sun. Misery stopped me from believing that all is well under the sun. and in history; the sun taught me that history isn’t everything."
ReplyDeleteI tried to write a blog about it, hope you also like it https://stenote.blogspot.com/2018/08/an-interview-with-albert_12.html